Why doesn't it exyend an HashMap?
JDK 1.1 compability?
Thanks,
Paulo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Util dependency on Collections?
>
>
> "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > From: "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > I saw all the the the following name suggestions in this thread, but
> > > like SequencedHashMap the most. However, the class currently extends
> > > Hashtable, and HashMap is non-sync'd...
> >
> > To sync a Map its
> >
> > Map synced = Collections.synchronizedMap( nonSynced );
>
> I know. I'm just saying that it is currently sync'd.
>
> > So do we need explicitly synced Maps anymore?
>
> I don't think so. Speaking of which, I'll eventually be looking into
> replacing BufferCache usage in SourceCast with LRUMap.
>
