Re: Util dependency on Collections?

[Jim Cheesman]

At 11:46 AM 30/08/01, you wrote:

>Actually, a horrible name like "InputOrderedMap" isn't _too_ bad - at
>least it says exactly what the class provides. No need to make it
>"InputTimeOrderedHashMap" - it's only important to know it implements
>the Map interface, not how it implements it.

Sounds good to me... Were I a committer, I'd vote for it ;)








--

                           *   Jim Cheesman   *
             Trabajo: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (34)(91) 724 9200 x 2360
              Exaggeration is not 
all it's cracked up to be.