--- PRD Indonesia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 02:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
> From: PRD Indonesia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Dita Sari: Several basic questions for
> Indonesian economists
> To: bonnie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>   Rev Diary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>   Maoist Guns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>   IHRC-NZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Red Part
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], zely ariane
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>   James Balowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, kpp prd
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Jakarta Post, 30 May 2005
> 
> Several basic questions for Indonesian economists 
> 
> Dita Indah Sari, Jakarta
> 
> The debate over the pros and cons of the fuel price
> increase has begun to become dreary. Even though in
> many regions voices of opposition can still be
> heard,
> the peak of the debate has already passed.
> 
> Unlike previous plans to increase the price of fuel,
> this time the polemic between economists in the mass
> media was both extensive and open. The opinion pages
> of many newspapers were filled with articles
> criticizing each respective position. This is a
> positive development, not just for the academic
> community but also for the general public, because
> the
> people were exposed to and able to consider
> alternative thinking. 
> 
> However, separate from this, the debate that emerged
> in the mass media and at seminars failed to touch
> upon
> a fundamental solution for our economy. It is true
> that the neo-liberal economic policies of the
> government have been subject to open criticism by
> many
> economists. The criticism of the continued
> dependency
> upon the International Monetary Fund (IMF), for
> example, pressured the government to formally end
> its
> cooperation with the IMF at the end of 2003. 
> 
> There has also been no shortage of critics of other
> policies that are neo-liberal in orientation, such
> as
> the reduction of import tariffs, the removal of
> minimum taxes, privatization, the basic cost of
> unhulled paddy, the reduction of fertilizer
> subsidies,
> etc. However, once again, the solutions being
> offered
> are partial and do not yet constitute an alternative
> packet that is both structurally and operationally
> different from what has been carried out up until
> now.
> 
> 
> One fundamental question that is often put forward
> is
> how to transform agrarian production in this country
> into a modern agriculture industry. Changing the
> mode
> of traditional agriculture with its low productivity
> will only be possible if it is accompanied by growth
> in basic industry, which must be capable of
> producing
> engines, fertilizer and seeds that can be accessed
> by
> farmers at the lowest possible cost. 
> 
> The restructuring of national industry needs to be
> prioritized in order to fulfill the needs of the
> rural
> sector, because it is this sector that has the
> highest
> rates of unemployment. 
> 
> Our economists have yet to put forward a clear plan
> of
> action in relation to this. There was fierce protest
> over the removal of fertilizer subsidies. However,
> the
> concept of national industrialization focused on the
> rural sector has not yet become a strong enough
> platform from which to challenge government policy
> (and that of their economists), which prefers to
> surrender the future of Indonesian farmers to the
> "wisdom" of the market. 
> 
> There has not been a concrete proposal as to how to
> maximize existing resources and potential in order
> to
> develop basic industry. 
> 
> The abandonment of two fertilizer factories in Aceh
> is
> a clear example of how the development of national
> industry has not been a priority for the government
> of
> Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and Jusuf Kalla. What are
> the
> solutions being offered by economists to resolve
> these
> problems? 
> 
> There also has not yet been a debate regarding how
> to
> overcome the problem of dependency upon imports,
> which
> constitutes the main structural problem of our
> nation's economy. Even though this dependence has
> long
> been known as the cause of the high cost of
> production, there has yet to emerge a clear
> alternative that clearly articulates the steps that
> must be prioritized in order to overcome this
> dependence. 
> 
> Successfully developing basic industry is the first
> step toward reducing our dependence upon imports.
> Material and technological capital that we can
> produce
> ourselves is not only capable of reducing production
> costs to the point that they are competitive, but in
> the longer term can also create a stronger and more
> stable economic structure. Moreover, Indonesia is
> such
> a rich country, filled with natural resources. Why
> have economists not objected to this export
> orientation on raw goods? Particularly considering
> that raw good exports are followed by the import of
> consumer goods from overseas countries, which,
> ironically, get their raw materials from Indonesia. 
> 
> Is it necessary to limit the export of raw goods and
> agricultural produce, so that these goods can be
> used
> to revive national industry? Is it necessary to
> limit
> natural gas exports to Japan and South Korea in
> order
> not to disturb the national fertilizer industry? If
> human capital is crucial for economic productivity,
> is
> it necessary to prohibit completely the
> privatization
> of the pharmaceutical industry, health care and
> education? 
> 
> Why is the State Logistics Agency (Bulog) only
> concerned about distributing and stabilizing the
> price
> of rice? What about the other agricultural and
> manufacturing products? Who is responsible for
> protecting their markets and prices? Should labor
> flexibility and the work contract system be
> maintained
> when there is no social safety net for those who are
> fired or made redundant? 
> 
> There are many questions that have yet to be
> answered
> by our economists. Alternative ideas that oppose
> mainstream economics, however, do not receive
> attention in the mass media. This is the reality.
> However small the space for discourse may now be, it
> is time to clearly differentiate between the
> different
> concepts and types of economic thinking. 
> 
> The battle between economists is the consequence of
> a
> constantly changing political situation, which
> forces
> people to make a choice. The people, in making a
> choice in accordance with their own interests, need
> something to guide them. Without alternative ideas,
> conveyed in their entirety, the people will have a
> difficult time imagining what this "better
> Indonesia"
> will look like. 
> 
> The writer is chairwoman of the Democratic People's
> Party (PRD). She can be reached at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Free all the Political Prisoner,
> STOP 'Secret' War in Aceh - Papua
> Withdraw TNI form Aceh: Ceasefire Now for Self
> Determination
> Extend Democratic Dialog for Papua People  
> Unite and Struggle to Establish the Government of
> United People for Indonesian Socialism
> STOP Imperialist Permanent War trough anti
> war-imperialism movement's unity
> Another World - Another Power - People Power IS
> POSSIBBLE !
> 
> Central Leadership Committe - People's Democratic
> Party (KPP-PRD): 
> 
> Zely Ariane 
> (Departement of International Relations) 
> 
> Jl. Tebet Utara II No. 9 
> Jakarta Selatan 12810 Indonesia
> Telp. (62)(21)8291745 
> Mobile. (62)815-8126673
> 
> 
>               
> __________________________________ 
> Do you Yahoo!? 
> Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site
> http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 




JAKER(Jaringan Kerja Kebudayaan Rakyat)
***************************************
sekretariat: 
JL.Tebet Timur Dalam IID No.10 Jakarta Selatan 12820 Indonesia 
telp/fax: +62218292842
email:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

People's Cultural Network
"Semua orang adalah seniman,setiap tempat adalah panggung!" 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jaker/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Kirim email ke