Sebastien Lelong wrote:
> 1. either we decide to be careful while writing comments in jal code, > and have to have in mind wiki syntax stuff. > 2. or I could generate an HTML file, instead of a wiki page > > For option 2., I think it's possible to put html file in svn which can > be accessed from googlecode website (to be tested). While we can have > better formatting results, we'd loose the searching capabilities of GC > wiki, which comes with no cost... For this last reason, I'd prefer 1., > but it's a new constraint: what you write in jal comment won't give the > same results in GC wiki. > > Let me know your choice ! Is the search facility so important in this case? With a good naming convention for the files it should be rather obvious which file you need for a specific subject. An advantage of html is that the formatting is preserved after downloading (will it be part of a download package?) via a browser. Alternatively converting a html file to pdf is possible. So obviously I would say: go for html. Regards, Rob. -- Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
