2008/9/1, Rob Hamerling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > So obviously I would say: go for html. > We ask from the developers (that's us ;-) to create nice, structured, good working code with a clean interface, according to the JSG and with documentation. This is a lot, but necessary. I think it is a bad idea to add more requirements, just because some tool currently can't do better. (I mean 'some' tool: for THE tool, i'd make an exception).
So my conclusion is the same as Rob: go for html. Joep --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
