We could also beta-release when we have a decent set of code. This would enable people to use (parts of) it more early.
Joep 2008/10/2, Sebastien LELONG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I'll leave the release up to you, but I must beg for a quick release. > > If we wait until *everything* is OK, we'll never release anything. > > Sure. I think we're closed to release. We still have a lot to do, mostly about > tests, samples, doc. > > I think we should feature-freeze libs, that is, not adding any more core libs > (device files, peripheral libs). > > Nothing will be perfect, I know that, from the beginning. But what I know too > is we have to release something "finished", no approximate work. Something > we'll use as a solid base for the next release, something users will like > because it's clean, it's clear, it's well-documented, it's standard, etc... > > Seb > -- > Sébastien LELONG > http://www.sirloon.net > http://sirbot.org > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
