On 4 Oct 2008, at 22:49 , Sebastien Lelong wrote: > >>> Joep suggests to create one main script >> Not nessesarly one script for everything, althoug maintaining >> mutliple, simalar scripts is inefficient. >> What is important is to keep the prerequisit for jallib small and >> simple. > > Did you give a try with "jallib" under win ? If not, don't :) I try > too, it's not working at all, because not recognized as an > executable... I'm so a noob under windows I don't even know how to > deal with a kind of PATH... I'll explore py2exe solution.
Python scripts under windoze should be run in a DOS box. (Start -> run -> CMD <enter>) DOS boxes are surprisingly effective. The PATH does not need to be modified, just make a batch file that point to the exe, like: C:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON\PYTHON.EXE %1 %2 %3 %4 %5 %6 %7 %8 %9 call it python.bat and save it in C:\WINDOWS > More importantly: do I need to spend some time on this script or not ? > Should I let users deal with their own solution on their own OS to > compile/use/... jallib and svn ? I'm personally ok to work on it but > wouldn't want it to be let unused... > >> IMHO jal and a default python install (the jallib default scripting >> language without any exotic libraries) should enable windows and >> linux >> users to contribute to jallib. > > I agree, I'll try to stick on this ! > > Seb > > > > > --- ir EE van Andel [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.fiwihex.nl Fiwihex B.V. Wierdensestraat 74, NL7604BK Almelo, Netherlands tel+31-546-491106 fax+31-546-491107 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
