Hi Seb,

Sebastien LELONG wrote:

> You're right, this should be done within the lib itself. But I keep saying 
> (and warning) that if it's in comments, it's dead. 

Some time ago I read here about code something like : "written once, 
read many times". I consider comment is an essential and integral part 
of the source, and it is generally more readable then the code itself.

> While jallibizing (!) some 
> libs, I've seen this dead code (I mean this happends for real) , and dead 
> code means wrong documentation, which sometime is worth than no doc at all.

Yes, the discipline of programmers is a yet unsolved problem.

> We need to find a way to put this information, but keep them kind of "alive". 
> Maybe a optional field in headers, strictly formatted so it can be checked.

I understood that jalapi would take care of it. But looking at the html 
files it might need some improvement.

Regards, Rob.


-- 
Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/)

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to