Hi Rob, > I understand from Wouter van Ooijen that he cannot use Jallib for his > work because of the license we use.
I wouldn't say "because of the license we use". The BSD license is IMHO perfect for what we're doing: compatible with most other OS licenses, can be used in commercial products, won't contaminate your code. > If he is right (in interpreting the > license) other people might also refrain from using Jallib. I'm still on this topic in jallist. I think I still don't understand the whole thing about restrictions being a killer. > I have always kept far from legal issues, but if we loose Wouter and > maybe others because of the license (regardless if rightly or wrongly > interpreted) then we should at least discuss it and maybe look for > alternatives. Sure, we need to discuss this. There was a recent topic about this, and I seem to be the only one reluctant to modify the license for hex files and programmed PIC. I obviously won't be against such modifications, but I must know where I put my time on this project. Cheers, Seb -- Sébastien LELONG http://www.sirloon.net http://sirbot.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
