> Do I have to (re-)register my old blink-tests? I'll do this by parsing the wiki page, to save you time. But we need to stop using the wiki page. At least for voting for samples. I'll "deprecate" it.
> Another point: it took me quite some time to do all my blink tests. > There are groups with almost the same pin layout, but I had to modify > the circuit (on my breadboard) several times. For non-trivial changes I > did some 'random' tests (2 or 3 different PICs) fotr the PIC for which > these changes were made. But strictly speaking al other previous tests > must be repeated. I don't like the idea of having to repeat that for > seemingly trivial changes..... I'd say just register the tests you actually perform, for real. PICs which are similar, but not tested, can still be "reached" using your http://code.google.com/p/jallib/wiki/DataSheet wiki for instance (if this is what you mean). I could enrich the html pages by analyzing other PICs similar to tested ones, and produce a "virtual testing meter" (but I need rules to know which PIC are similar). Cheers, Seb -- Sébastien LELONG http://www.sirloon.net http://sirbot.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
