> > The timing may not be the only issue. I have also seen differences in > channel selection. Note: the way the channel selection bits in ADCON0 > are set must be improved because different PICs have not only different > number of channels, but also the CHS bits may have a different position > in Adcon0. We should possibly do a thorough research on differences. > Since I've done some research on ADC registers in the past for the > device file generation, I'll see if I can refine one of my scripts to > obtain an overview of differences.
I don't have this file in front of me, but I can remember things about channel selection in pconfig.h (or adc.h ?), according to the group PICs belong to. > > I don't have strong opinion on this. I would go on the "quick fix" way, > but > > this will add some more noise to the lib. The "generic" way is still full > of > > haze, as far as I'm concerned. > > > > What's your point ? > > Preferrably a single person must take the lead about ADC lib > development. Since most of us are busy with one or another aspect of > Jallib, and ADC seems not to have a high priority with one of us, we > must find a new person to take care of ADC. Or the priorities must be > shuffled (but that may have a bad influence on motivation!). Finding a new person might take more time than writing the lib from scratch :) I can handle this, but wouldn't want spending 100% on my time on this. That's why I was talking about a background task. Seb -- Sébastien Lelong http://www.sirloon.net http://sirbot.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
