Hi Seb & Joep, I have more or less the same feeling as Joep, interperters are nice for flexibility and to test (hardware) without the need of a development environment. At Philips (where I work) , we mainly use a forth like language (called Fifth) to test new hardware (FPGAs, ASICS) In one point in time I've tried to port it to a PIC, but I ran in too much issue to make it usable (mainly footprint), so I switched to JAL, In my opinion the PICs 12/16/18 series are too small (both computation time and memory/storage space) to make it really usable for an interperter language to build serious applications. Therefore I think the focus should be on a good set of easy to use well documented libraries with lots of samples, improving the compiler/libraries for speed and footprint, and have an easy to use development enviroment. Albert
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
