Hi Albert, 2009/5/7 a.faber <[email protected]>: > Not bad, so it might be feasible to port it to a PIC 18f Just reached 'code complete' just below 16kbytes and porting to an pic18f won't be that much work (but porting to jal is, since it uses quite a lot of structures). Porting is however not that usefull, since it is way to basic for general applications (you need at least support to learn new words). But it is very usefull to test if this concept (a fsm engine with forth-alike conditions and actions, providing the high-level control in an C robot program) does provide flexibility and speedy development as expected, without too much limitations.
> Sounds nice, though I have not any practical experience with Atmel devices Atmel and PIC are not that different... Joep PS I am aware this thread got quite off-topic, but I like to hear your opinion also on this OT subject. If someone minds, please let me know. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
