Hi Seb,
I've no preference!
I have already changed the dev2jal script (but not committed the change)
to enumerate VCFG when it contains 2 bits... No big deal to undo it or
have both declarations!
Regards, Rob.
Sebastien Lelong wrote:
> Thinking again about this naming convention... Here the kind of code that I
> could write for VCFG bits:
>
> (say ADC_NVREF is the number of vref, can have value 0, 1 or 2)
>
> - When separated in VCFG0 and VCFG1:
>
> if ADC_NVREF == 1 then
> VCFG0 = true
> end if
> if ADC_NVREF == 2
> VCFG1 = true
> end if
>
> - When defined as bit*2:
>
> VCFG = ADC_NVREF
>
>
> The 2nd one, which corresponds to the opposite of what I've suggested, is
> far simpler... but does not correspond to the datasheet notation !
>
> So I don't know which is best. Maybe both ? :) What's your opinion on this ?
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
