Hi Seb,
Sebastien Lelong wrote: > > I don't know if it's good to have both "bit*2 VCFG" and "VCG0/VCFG1" in > device files, from design point of view, I agree! > but it's ok for you, I'd prefer > having both: VCFG0/VCFG1 respects datasheets names, while "bit*2 VCFG" > provides an interesting shortcut while coding the Vref management. > > It it's not a big deal, let's have both ! OK! > > I'd suggest *not* to commit new device files, and wait for the 0.3 release. > For the moment I'll keep 'm for myself.. Regards, Rob. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
