Hi Seb,
Sebastien Lelong wrote: >>> OK, please let me know when you think it'll ok with this ANSELx/ANSx >>> normlization. I'll have to modify adc_channels.jal as needed. >> OK, but I prefer to make 1 (major) change at a time. Now I'm working on >> the aliases declarations. ANSEL has to wait a little. > > Sure, no problem, it's just about not letting dead code in ADC libs. (will > we be sure these bits remain the same in the future ?) Depends on Microchip's whimsicality.... We should always be aware of changes in the .dev files and be prepared to adapt (1) our device files or (2) our libraries in that order or priority. I'm always trying to (re-)organize my scripts for the device files as flexible as possible, so that changes in MPLAB have limited impact. >> Another issue with pinmap.py with the 18F14k50 (and sisters): The >> datasheet does specify RA3/1/0 (with restrictions) and these do have >> aliases, but pinmap.py doesn't mention RA3/1/0 at all for thee PICs. >> > > Fixed, as well as 12HV609 and 615 from a previous post. rev. 1065. OK! Up to a perfect pinmap.py! Regards, Rob. -- Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
