maybe openoffice is an altenative in the way it is open source. ;ynx
should also be on the list. The pjal doc is written in it. ( gave it a
try but until now, i find it hard to use and can't find some functions
(although i can't imagine they are not supported).
Joep

2009/8/21, Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]>:
> Hi,
>
> OpenOffice could be an option but have the same problem as Word:
>
>   1. personal taste: same issue as Word, I don't like triggering a big tool
> just to fix few typos for instance.
>   2. consistent output: many people (I hope...) will enrich this document.
> How to make sure we'll have the same consistent output with tools like OO or
> Word ? Correctly use styles ? Will this be enough ? Will we be able to keep
> a professional (or high quality) looking documentation ?
>   3. important point is to be able to put in under SVN so we can see
> differences between two versions, what's been added in the local copy, ...
> just like code. Word as OO docs are imported as binary format, and SVN won't
> show any diff on it (just an "something has changed..."). How to make sure
> someone didn't change something unexpectidely ?
>   4. how to (easily) script documentation processing ? When original doc
> source is in format like LaTEX, Docbook or ASCIIDOC, you can make it built,
> checked and  produce output automatically.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Seb
>
>
>
>>
>> I don't understand why not OpenOffice.org doc? It can export also in
>> HTML/XHTML, PDF, MediaWiki txt, BibTeX, LaTeX 2e and is ported on all
>> operating systems. It can save also in MS Word format, and many
>> others.
>>
>> ------------------
>> Vasi (http://moriscanet.blogspot.com)
>>
>> On Aug 21, 3:52 pm, Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi guys,
>> >
>> > You've probably heard about documentation issues these last weeks. Toon
>> and
>> > Joep started to write a "jalv2 & jallib - an introduction" document. As
>> > a
>> > Word file. First drafts clearly show interests for this kind of
>> > documentation, but there are lots of other source of information which
>> could
>> > be used to enrich it, like some blog posts.
>> >
>> > Maybe it's time to normalize this and provide a common way to produce
>> this
>> > kind of documentation. One important aspect is it must be under SVN. Not
>> > only the file, but also the content. SVN should be able to deal with
>> > documentation as it does for the code, namely documentation should be in
>> > text format. It also shouldn't a pain fixing just a typo, so not having
>> > a
>> > turn on Word would really make things easier (IMO). Finally, one source
>> (one
>> > file) must be able to produce different format, like HTML, PDF, ASCII,
>> > PS
>> or
>> > the like. And this whole thing must be scripted, so it's part of the
>> > development process (hopefully as a quality requirement).
>> >
>> > So... this raises the question: "which tool ?". Professional
>> documentation
>> > writer, if any here, may help. I'm not a doc write, but used LaTEX,
>> Docbook
>> > and ReST a litlle. Recently, I had a look at Asciidoc, and it seems
>> > quite
>> a
>> > nice choice (http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/). It allows to have a
>> > readable ASCII doc, and produce very nice HTML, XHTML, PDf, etc, ... and
>> > intermediary format like Docbook. Highly configurable too.
>> >
>> > Ideally one would write his doc in his format, integrate it to the main
>> book
>> > ("an introduction") but also upload it to our upcoming jalv2 website.
>> >
>> > I think I'll try to convert current Toon&Joep's document and let you
>> > have
>> a
>> > look at the results. In the meantime, if you have suggestions and/or
>> > objections... (and most importantly, will you agree to invest some time
>> on
>> > this kind of tool ?)
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Seb
>> > --
>> > Sébastien Lelonghttp://www.sirloon.nethttp://sirbot.org
>> >
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to