no worries matt. i'll follow up tonight. william
mattschinkel wrote: > Sorry william, I did not mean anything bad by my comment. William did > make a very good original init routine for 16F pic's for mode 0,0 > > "buggy" was the wrong term to use, it simply needs upgrading. > > As you know, I have not been around here as long as everyone else, so > please excuse my mistakes. > > Matt. > > On Sep 1, 9:14 am, Joep Suijs <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2009/9/1 mattschinkel <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > William, I would consider your original init routine to be "buggy" > > > since it will not work with 18f chips. > > > > First of all, I don't agree. A bug means that the program works > > differently as designed and obviously, William wrote this library to > > work with (some?) 16f chips. It is good to 'extend the functionality' > > for this lib to work with more (and ultimately all) pics. But that's > > not bugfixing. > > > > Second, the remark does not appear to be too kind to William and I > > don't see why. > > Also in my experience, there are always bugs in software and those > > bugs surface in unforseen (hence untested) situations. So what he > > states can be concidered as a fact, and hence not blamed to anybody. > > This fact has to be taken into concideration when you want to refactor > > a library and, for example, want to provide a universal interface. I > > don't know if I share his verdict - this depends on the knowledge on > > SPI periperals and SPI standards. With in depth knowledge you could go > > for the top-down approach. Without it, concider William's suggestion. > > > > Joep --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
