Hi William, Yes the bitfields are the same, see also http://code.google.com/p/jallib/wiki/FindSSPCON However, you might have to check if the statemachine behaviour is exactly the same, for I2C there are small differences. Regards Albert
----- Original Message ----- From: "William" <[email protected]> To: "jallib" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 8:26 AM Subject: [jallib] Re: SPI Albert, Thanks for bringing the i2c stuff to my attention. I guess in retrospect, we should have had an MSSP hardware alias file, used by both SPI and I2C ? And maybe MicroWire if anyone wants to do that also. Is it really as simple as just the names? I wasn't sure if all of the devices had the exact same bit-field layout in the registers. William On Sep 1, 1:49pm, AlbertF <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1 sep, 17:50, mattschinkel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > so, to my understanding, all 14f series chips register names like > > SSPCON_CKP, and 18f chips have SSP1CON_CKP (according to > > devicefiles.html) > > Hi William, > You might take a look at i2c_hardware_aliases.jal file, where the same > issues regarding the SSPCON registers have been resolved > Albert --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
