Hi William,
William wrote: > I actually did spend five minutes or so trying to find the file/guess > the path, before I wrote you. I even used the 'changes' button on web- > based SVN. While I see it now, I didn't see it then. An oversight on > my part. OK, happens to everybody from time to time! > I have a lot to learn about JALLIB and how it operates and what is > 'under the hood' that makes the nice 'packs' and all the other > resources work. Thus my questions from time to time. > > I appreciate your contributions very much, for example when I needed > the definition for the 18F2585 -- there it was, complete and correct! > This saved me many hours of work. Thanks you! > It is too bad that we can't sit down face-to-face once in a while - > sometimes the email/google-group format tends more towards 1-way > 'announcements' rather than genuine 2-way communication. Neverhteless, when you are in the neighbourhood...... > William No comments w.r.t. Q/A below? >>> Why wouldn't production status be of interest? >> I don't think that it is for the development or maintenance of Jallib >> software of interest if a product is 'in production', a 'future', >> 'mature' or 'obsolete' product, or whatever this column contains. But if >> you have a good argument to have this info listed then I'll list it in a >> next version. Regards, Rob. -- Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
