Hi Matt, 2009/10/31 mattschinkel <[email protected]>
> > Joep, are you saying serial_hw_write_word() it should not be in > serial_hardware.jal? Should the software version's procedures match > the hardware version? You're right and if there was no history, I'd say serial_sw_write() should be removed. > If it is added, others will have a choice weather to use it or not, if > they don't use it, it does not take any more code space. True. However, I think it is better to create a generic function with the desired device as a parameter. Maybe part of print.jal or in a separate library. And when we have this, we could mark serial_sw_write() obsolete. Joep --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
