I would like to see a jallib library: -for small misc functions/procedures like this one that we can use in our tutorial book & samples
-for things new users don't know how to do: make a dword out of four bytes make 4 bytes out of a dword take a byte out of a dword take a bit out of a byte If you have ever seen a new users code, you will notice a tone of truncation warnings because they don't know how to take a byte out of a word or dword What do u think? Matt. On Oct 31, 4:39 pm, Joep Suijs <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > 2009/10/31 mattschinkel <[email protected]> > > > > > Joep, are you saying serial_hw_write_word() it should not be in > > serial_hardware.jal? Should the software version's procedures match > > the hardware version? > > You're right and if there was no history, I'd say serial_sw_write() should > be removed. > > > If it is added, others will have a choice weather to use it or not, if > > they don't use it, it does not take any more code space. > > True. However, I think it is better to create a generic function with > the desired device as a parameter. Maybe part of print.jal or in a separate > library. And when we have this, we could mark serial_sw_write() obsolete. > > Joep --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
