Hi Seb,
Yes, my reaction is because of a failing bee-package build.
I agree we should not put beta-software in our official releases, but I
don;t see problems with putting a beta-compiler in the 'bee'-package.
By all means this is (maybe not obvious enough) a package with disclaimers.
Regards, Rob.
Sebastien Lelong wrote:
Are these results from bee ? (I didn't have a look)
Here we are again with this topic :) If we keep our decision not to
release beta compiler, 2.4n dependent files be removed or this will
produce errors while packaging.
Or should we release beta compiler ?...
Cheers,
Seb
2010/2/28 Rob Hamerling <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Hi guys,
It seems we have a sort of conflict with the compiler versions. The
file TORELEASE contains samples and device files which require 2.4n,
but we agreed not to release beta-code. So should all 2.4n
dependent files be removed from TORELEASE?
Regards, Rob.
--
Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/)
--
Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
