Hi Seb, I don't have a good overview of the build processes packages etc, so keep this in mind when you judge my statements ;)
2010/2/28 Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]>: > Hi Joep, > >> >> @seb >> > (we want to release some libs/samples not dependent to beta, >> > but compiler is still beta), how will we deal with that ? >> How likely is it we do an official release when the compiler is still in >> beta? > > Not sure what you mean... If "we actually release when compiler isn't beta > anymore", I agree, but what if we decide to release 2 versions of jallib > between one compiler version ? This sure can happen. I don't see the difference. In general the compiler is only beta for a short period of time and in that case it is good to use the compiler. (This assumes we do not upgrade to a beta that is not likely to be released shortly, if that would ever occure). The special situation is when the beta compiler turns out to need more work and that work takes longer time, we should downgrade to the stable version. This could result in loss of functionality (new features), but we can't release libraries for features that are not supported anyway. And I don't see why downgrading to the latest stable compiler would take a lot of time... Joep -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
