Hi Rob, >From what I understand, our definitive decision about putting beta compiler in Jallib SVN is temporarily postponed. Ah, procrastination, my friend :)
2010/3/7 Rob Hamerling <[email protected]> > > JalV2 2.4n is required for the extended midrange PICs. > I have reported two issues to Kyle. For one he gave me a source fix, but as > far as I know he didn't update the published files at his site yet. I have > built a fixed executable for myself, and could provide fixed Linux and > Windows executables as interim solution. But an interim solution for a beta > compiler..... I doubt if this is a good thing. > Yes, not a good idea IMO too... > > The other is an issue with warnings for 'cexpr', which I got when compiling > ADC samples. I have not tested an ADC sample with warnings, so I don't know > the effect of these warnings. > Didn't test this too. > > Not that I would withdraw my request to put 2.4n-beta in the Jallib tree, > but I see some drawbacks... Maybe this website could help :) http://www.random.org/dice/?num=2 Cheers, Seb -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
