debatable :-) Sunish
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 4:21 AM, mattschinkel <[email protected]>wrote: > > No, a Jallib reference needs to be separate. Also IMO the libraries, > > even with current style rules need to be re-organised. I've had a bit > > of a look at this in CatPad project. > > I would not put much reference to jallib, but this book is being built > by jallib. It is good advertizing for jallib. I would point people to > the jallib style guide, they do not need to follow it. If the style > guide is changed, then the book could be changed. > > All code snippets should match styleguide, don't you think so? > > Matt. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jallib" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<jallib%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
