What about "Advanced samples"? I saw this on many distributions...
On Jul 31, 8:12 am, Rob Hamerling <[email protected]> wrote: > In that case I have only sample programs! ;-) > Rob. > > On 07/31/10 03:29 pm, funlw65 wrote: > > > > > And obligatory CAD files for the board used in project, full > > documentation, photos with the final project and maybe a movie with > > the running application which prove that the project was realized and > > fully tested. All required to permit the reproduction of the project. > > Not only the firmware, not matter how complex it is. > > That does not constitute a DIY project. > > > Vasi(funlw65) > > > On Jul 31, 12:41 am, Rob Hamerling<[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi guys, > > >> Do we have criteria to decide if a program qualifies as sample or as > >> project? I can think of the following criteria: > >> - filesize > >> - number of lines of code > >> - amount and quality of 'learning' information > >> - number of used libraries > >> - complexity of the code > >> - general purpose or very specific application > >> - is it the only program using a specific library > >> Not all of these are easy to define.... > > >> Reason to ask: my alarm_clock project is pretty large, but not very > >> complex and reasonably documented (in the form of comments in the > >> source). I decided to put it in 'projects', but it might as well be a > >> sample, because it is currently the only program using the new > >> rtc_hardware library. > > >> Regards, Rob. > > >> -- > >> Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) > > -- > Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
