> So, for almost any PIC, talking about a precisely 100nS delay is a waste of > time. > > Vasile
I know it can not be precise. Neither can 1us delay on a low speed processor. At some extremely slow speed even a 1sec delay can't be accurate. As Joep mentioned, using "asm nop" is clock dependent. This is why I would prefer a delay procedure. I would like my library to work in the future when someday we have much faster processors. I'd prefer not to do a blocking 1us delay if I don't have to. Why would I want to waste 0.9us of my life :) Matt. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
