> >> But that limit seems 96 (SW stack of 887) not 80. > > > > Someone wrote, the "shared memory" would not be used, > and I believed that without asking. So I subtracted the 16 > bytes ;-) > > > > Correct! But you probably missed in Figure 2-3 of > DS30292C the 16 'extra' bytes in bank 2 (110h..11Fh) > and 3 (190h..19Fh) to make two contiguous ranges of 96 bytes > above the shared area.
Oh, thanks! I've not seen a memory layout like this yet and had only a brief glance at the datasheet for the bank size. By the way, does anyone know why the shared memory is not used? Or is it used for internal purposes? If it was not used, it could be simply regarded as a bigger page 0 or the like. Greets, Kiste -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
