> We could specify in the device files shared memory as > non-shared, but that gives a gain of only a few bytes (max > 14 bytes for the midrange and max 126 for the 18Fs, > frequently less).
Oh, well... "semi-hardcoded" workarounds for problems that are worked on... That's not what I call sensible. > But another option - probably more generic - would be for > the compiler to ignore the word 'shared' in 'pragma shared > 0x.....' and use that memory as non-shared! Lots of possibilities to gain a few bytes... > Kyle reported that he has revision of memory allocation > high on his todo list, so I consider intermediate temporary > solutions in the device files with only limited effect as a > waste of time. After your great explanation, I fully aggree with you. Thanks! Greets, Kiste -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
