Hi, > So, FTDI or CDC ? FTDI indeed requires a driver, but doesn't CDC too ?? FTDI > is also widely used, it's become a standard. I would prefer a USB converter > acting as a FTDI device, but I think implementation is far from easy (and > maybe not open). Microsoft started off quite bad on the cdc driver. They do improve but iirc there is still a bug with toggling RTS / DTR on XP. Don't know if this is resolved in newer versions. FDTI drivers are much more stable in my experience. Downside is you are not allowed to use the FTDI drivers with other chips than FTDI. There are however implementations of the driver on PICs that seem to work okay.
Joep -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
