just to explain this more.... the class files, like usb_drv_cdc_class.jal and eventually MSD currently call those registers, and no other registers. If we can call a procedure instead, it will be simple to port this file to another processor if there are usb driver files available.
So, is it ok with you Seb? PS: I didn't actually read fully through usb_drv_cdc_class.jal to see if it uses other registers, but I do know that I will not need any others while writing a lib for msd class driver. Matt. On Apr 3, 3:32 am, mattschinkel <[email protected]> wrote: > > But what would be the benefits ? > > readability, and standardization. Maybe we'll be running USB on > another type of processor some day. > > Matt. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
