Greetings, On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:11:50 -0700 (PDT), Oliver Seitz wrote > > In the mean time, I may give a try with implementing Minix v2 filesystem. > > I've been looking for even simpler file systems than FAT, too. And > I've found minix as well. ;-) But, just as you said, minix v1 is too > restricted for today's demands, and v2 is not so simple.
If you're poking around anyway, the old CP/M filesystem, and even the one used by TRS-80 are fairly simple. If I recall, the Commodore-64 simply used a linked-list of 256-byte sectors, with the last 4 bytes pointing to the next one. -- Kyle York -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
