Hi Seb,

On May 6, 6:56 am, Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> The following scenario makes
> sense: what if someone wants to use MCP2515 device, using can_mcp2515.jal
> library, on MSSP2 module, or on SPI software ? Current implementation
> directly use spi_master_hw pseudo-var, and would require usage of
> intermediate aliases (eg. alias spi_master is spi_master_hw). Will we be
> able to modify this ? Another question I'm asking...

This sounds very interesting, since supporting mssp2 is an actual
improvement/ new feature.  But only if it is tested with real hardware
-- re-test the old samples, and create a new sample that uses mssp2.
Be sure to add 'adapted-by'.

William

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.

Reply via email to