Hi, 2011/5/9 Oliver Seitz <[email protected]>: > My feeling is that an "end user" of a library expects fast and reliable > execution and low overhead. He would not care if the lines that generated the > hex file were human readable or not. I guess the end user also wants reliable code. Research proves there is a distinct correlation between easy-to-read code and error rate (amongst many, mentioned in 'code complete' by Steve McConnell). So moving to asm might require additional QA measures. Btw, anybody have experience with using ASM (more then a few statements) with JAL?
Joep -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
