On May 7, 9:28 am, Joep Suijs <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2011/5/4 Mike <[email protected]>:
>
> > It *Should* be based on this
>
> Could you explain why it *should* be using inline assembler?
>
> The jallib style guide says:
>
> > Avoid the use of inline Assembler. If you cannot do without it...
I agree, Libraries or Jal programs should not gratuitously use
Assembler (there is a RTC library which does, and I think it doesn't
need to).
The offending lines in this case are
Assembler
rlf bin[0],f
rlf bin[1],f
rlf bcd[4],f
rlf bcd[2],f
rlf bcd[0],f
End Assembler
How do I do that in Jal?
Anyway I'm very short of spare time so I haven't had time to replace/
upgrade the format library
The difference is enormous in cpu cycles and code.
Here is full example program http://www.techtir.ie/node/1003701
(zip file with my bcdutils included)
Here is some HW info http://www.techtir.ie/node/1003699
Next I'm making 11 and 13 digit VFD (futaba) version with ability for
frequency count more than 16 bits and an input level (Supply or RF
signal, and linear Volts, or dBuV, dBmW etc) on one part of display
with frequency on other part 3 digits + 8 or 9 digits
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
