Hi Matt, On May 8, 9:31 pm, mattschinkel <[email protected]> wrote: > It's good, but seems to accomplish the same thing as the current > constant does, or am I missing something? The named constant seems > more clear. Both ways take up 1 line of code. >
Is there a specific sample I could review? I am probably confused by these small code fragments. I didn't realize you already had samples using the 4 new mode routines. William -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
