Hi, 2011/5/16 Rob Hamerling <[email protected]>: > I have no idea (yet). Maybe I misunderstand JAT, but wouldn't it be > easier to use the include files of one of Microchip C compilers?
It is indeed designed to use the definition from the C-compiler, so there is no need to re-define every device in JAL device files. @Hubert, It is indeed a jal-to-c translator. The first idea was to create a grammar definition of JAL, but got a bit out of hand ;) The current implementation proved the concept works. However, the language is not fully implemented. At the time I abandoned further development to investigate the creation of a C-backend for the JAL compiler. This proved to have quite some impact, amongst others since this does require to have a JAL device file. The documentation is at the level one would expect for a proof-of-concept ;) Some experience with the C language and C toolschain for the designated target is required IMO. And the archive of this list (jan-may 2010) would be the best resource of information. Joep -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
