> I have no idea (yet). Maybe I misunderstand JAT, but wouldn't it be > easier to use the include files of one of Microchip C compilers?
This will need to be tested to see what is better. In the case of 18F, it would be better to use one of our current device files for compatibility. As for PIC32, it may also be nice to use a device file that is like our current device files. With our own device files, maybe JAT would be compatible with any C compiler. The point in using JAT for me, is to stay away from C, but use a larger, faster processor. Matt. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
