Hi guys, 2011/10/7 Rob Hamerling <[email protected]>: > On 7-10-11 06:26, mattschinkel wrote: >> > The samples we are talking about now are not mine. These are generated with the jallib python script from two files, who can have different authors. Iirc, both source files are mentioned in the result
> With the copy/modify method I think it is fair to keep the name of the > original author in the source one way or another. But when there are > significantly more changes or additions than original code then I think it > is acceptable to use your own name as (only or primary) author. For generated files, IMO naming the source files is appropriate. The main author is probably often the one who created the main loop. Joep -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
