Hi Matt,

I made some fixes in i2c_software and brief test show it works now. It
should be slightly faster too (although if you need speed, use
i2c_hardware).
Please execute some more test if you can, to see the fix does not
introduce new issues.

Thanks,
Joep

2011/10/7 Joep Suijs <[email protected]>:
> Interesting issue. My guess would have been that i2c sw is pretty
> robust, but the hw version still has some issues hidden away.
> I'll try to reproduce and track it down when I have the chance.
>
> Btw, when working on an other project, I found that that I could fix a
> bug by printing a used variable, but not with declaring it volatile.
> It seems I run into these kind of bugs more often than other :(. Any
> known issues with the compiler that could explain this?
>
> Joep
>
> 2011/10/7 mattschinkel <[email protected]>:
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> I may have found an issue with I2C sw master. I have tested with
>> i2c_sw_master_echo & i2c_hw_master_echo samples, with
>> i2c_hw_slave_echo.
>>
>> On the slave side, the following procedure only works with the master
>> if it is hw, not sw. you can see I added a delay. Even a 1ms delay
>> gives the same result. A slave may be slow at storing data.
>>
>> -- This callback is used when master sends a data byte
>> procedure i2c_hw_slave_on_state_2(byte in rcv) is
>>   pragma inline
>>   data = rcv + 1
>>   _usec_delay(10_000) -- added for slow slave
>> end procedure
>>
>> I tried to search through for a fix, but didn't have any luck.
>>
>> Matt.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "jallib" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.

Reply via email to