> SVN learns that print_sword_fp_dec() is added by Watty about a year > ago. IMHO this procedure does not belong in print.jal. (One could > argue it should, but then there should be similar functions for all > supported variables). As far as I am concerned, the procedure should > be removed.
So, please remove it, and see if anything fails buildbot. Watty may have an opinion? > Refactoring of format.jal is long overdue. As far as I remember the > interface (API) is pretty good, but there are a few quirks in the > implementation. One I recall is that the desired nr of chars is not > always correct processed. An other thing is that overflow (that is: > the number does not fit in the designated place) does generate > garbage. Although it can be argued that this garbage is still > informative to the developer, IMHO it is better to have a clear > overflow-indicator, like printing '#' on all digits. > I once did a rewrite on request (don't recall who), but never got > feedback on the result and removed it from svn. Should be there > somewhere ;) I took the fact that nobody replied as that nobody disagreed, and therefore you should have used it. Matt. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
