> I thought another tool was a bad idea at the time and analysing the > samples shows it is.
I don't get what you mean here? Is there a problem with my samples, or do you not like differences between alike samples from different generators? > No doubt your tool has some nice features, but because it is separate > you don't benefit from the effort put into the board/test files and we > (I guess, Seb, Albert and I) don't benefit from the effort you put in. Of course, but I find I benefit more on my own with this then if I had been working with the old generator which I tried. I can generate a lot of samples quick and easily with 65 pre-made code snippets. It seems my generator has not been given a chance since nobody has tried it, and nobody has seen my progress (except for samples generated). I only ask to put it somewhere, even if it is only in casualties since that may be where it belongs right now. I do realize that I should re-write it in a multi-platform language, and I can do so. This could be one reason that it has not been tried. Even without the generator it's self, the code snippets are useful. Copy/Paste working code blocks is great, and I think Seb's IDE feature would benefit from these. Matt. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
