Matt
Try as I may I cannot solve my problems attempting to use the 74HTC08 but I 
will keep trying.

Can I ask you a question regarding the resistor dividor networks shown in 
the tutorial schematic illustrating the use of the 23k256 sram.
Two of the SPI lines ( SS and SDO) use 1.5k/3.3k resistors to step down the 
voltage but for the CLK line you indicate 470/2k.
Why does this divider network differ from the other two lines. 
Understanding this may just help me to see what I have done wrong using the
74HTC08.

As you have probably guessed my knowledge is weak on the electronics side 
of things.

Kind Regards
Dave Paxton

On Friday, 7 September 2012 10:09:07 UTC+1, mattschinkel wrote:
>
> Sorry, I've been to busy to test anything.
>
> If your getting 0xFF there must be something wrong with the hardware or 
> your connections. You do not need to do any level conversion for the SDO 
> line (signal out of 235254 to the PIC).
>
> 74HCT08 will work, I've done it in the past.
>
> Matt.
>
> On Tuesday, September 4, 2012 8:16:03 AM UTC-4, PDSACAA wrote:
>>
>> Matt
>> I knocked out a board using the 74HCT08 logic IC and a LD1117V33 voltage 
>> regulator to guarantee a 3.3V supply voltage to
>> the IC.
>> I jumpered together the pair of logic input pins on each of the 4 IC 
>> gates and fed the PIC outputs CLK,SDO and SS 
>> to 3 of these IC input pairs. Fed the 3 IC outputs to the 28K256. The 
>> 28k256 SO line went straight to PIC SDI pin as before and as 
>> per tutorial schematic.
>> I checked all of the IC output voltage levels using simple program to 
>> raise or lower PIC pins. These seemed ok dropping to 0v
>> low or rising to 3.68V high.
>>
>> Unfortunately when running sample program to read/write 28k256 via the 
>> 74HCT08, I get nothing but FF's.
>> I have checked, checked and rechecked wiring but can't find anything 
>> wrong.
>>
>> I take it that it goes without saying that the 74HCT08 can switch at the 
>> clock speeds the SPI routines throw at it?
>> I dropped the CLK speed down to the minimum but this showed no difference.
>> Have you got any ideas where I might have slipped up?
>>
>> At least the resistor divider network worked up to a point!!
>>
>> Regards
>> Dave
>>
>> On Sunday, 2 September 2012 02:51:10 UTC+1, mattschinkel wrote:
>>>
>>> Please try the 74HCT08. The resistor divider should work as well, but 
>>> 74HCT08 will give you better signals.
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/jallib/-/rII8uV_kck4J.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.

Reply via email to