Hi Matt,

> I think we need to communicate on what samples each of us should
generate.
> For example, I see that you are generating debug samples now, but
instead,
> you could ask me to generate for the devices you need samples for.
You were not here, so I decided to take convert some of your sample to the
jallib.py methode, so more chips and more benefit. I choose generic samples
that should run on many chips.

> We don't both need to generate samples for the same namespace.
That's my intention.

> I agree that only generated samples should be kept for each name space,
and all manually created ones should be removed.
That's not my suggestion.
My suggestion is: one generation method per namespace. So multiple manual
generated samples can exist in a namespace. (if this is the best way, is
another question).

> I see 18f67j50_debug.jal and others I generated were removed. I need to
regenerate debug samples (I have made minor changes to the sample code).
Please not. My suggestion is you don't don't generate samples your scripts
anymore for the ones I have converted to the jallib.py mehod and remove the
remaining ones. If you have a problem with that, I'll remove mine from that
namespace.

> but yours required more work for me to generate samples.
It is not my method. It is the one developed by Seb for jallib and used by
Seb, Albert and myself. I just took up the maintenance task for these
samples. And yes, it may take some effort to get familiar with this method,
but it is quite suitable - at least for the more generic sampels - and it
pays off in the long term. Imagine all samples of Seb and Albert gone.

Joep

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to