Hi Matt!
Well, I don't use 64bit... Most of the machines could, but I have mostly 32-bit
systems installed.
Anyway, having a 64bit executable won't hurt me either ;-)
Greets,Kiste
Von: Matthew Schinkel <[email protected]>
An: jallib <[email protected]>
Gesendet: 20:34 Sonntag, 3.Januar 2016
Betreff: [jallib] Re: 64-bits version of the compiler for Linux
Hi Rob,
64-bit should be added, as we all use 64 bit machines these days. It would of
course be preferable to have Kyle add it to his releases. You can add it to
jallib, but I worry about who will build future versions.
Matt.
On Sunday, January 3, 2016 at 10:35:52 AM UTC-5, RobH wrote:
Hi Matt (and other Linux users)
I have built a 64-bits version of JalV2 for Linux. I needed to make some
changes in the makefiles provided by Kyle (and reported these and some
other problems to him privately). When compiling the samples I found
that my version is considerably faster (>25%). It is also less than half
the size of the Linux executable distributed by Kyle. I don't know if
Kyle can and wants to add a 64-bits version to his distribution (and
when), but I could add mine to Jallib until that happens. Good idea?
Regards, Rob.
Happy New Year to all!
--
*Rob H*amerling - http://www.robh.nl
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jallib" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/jallib.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jallib" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/jallib.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
