Is it difficult to compile a win64 version ? If there is such a big performance improvement on Linux, then it would good to have a win64 version too.
Best regards, Sunish On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Rob Hamerling <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 01/03/2016 08:34 PM, Matthew Schinkel wrote: > >> >> 64-bit should be added, as we all use 64 bit machines these days. It >> would of course be preferable to have Kyle add it to his releases. You can >> add it to jallib, but I worry about who will build future versions. >> >> As you'll have seen I've added my 64-bits version of the current compiler > for Linux (jalv24q5_64) to the compiler directory. I don't understand why > the second part of the log file appeared, probably an update of my local > copy of Jallib. > > Although I have tested this version of the compiler I consider it still > provisional and I've not updated TORELEASE and readme files. Someone else > should test it too to raise its status. > > About future versions: ask my successor :-( > > Regards, Rob. > > > > -- > *Rob H*amerling - http://www.robh.nl > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jallib" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/jallib. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/jallib. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
