So you're just counting overflows, ignoring the actual counts? That reduces accuracy a bit ;-)
Greets, Kiste -------------------------------------------- Matt Schinkel <[email protected]> schrieb am Fr, 8.7.2016: Betreff: Re: [jallib] Freq Counter ACCURACY An: [email protected] Datum: Freitag, 8. Juli, 2016 15:01 Uhr 8 bit timer was more accurate for me likely due to my implementation. I used timer interrupts for the count (to step a variable). A 8 bit timer interrupts more often, at a count of 0xFF instead of 0xFFFF. Sent from my iPhone -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/jallib. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
