I agree, but you might be able to add the remaining timer value at your 1hz interrupt.
Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 8, 2016, at 2:02 PM, 'Oliver Seitz' via jallib > <[email protected]> wrote: > > So you're just counting overflows, ignoring the actual counts? That reduces > accuracy a bit ;-) > > Greets, > Kiste > -------------------------------------------- > Matt Schinkel <[email protected]> schrieb am Fr, 8.7.2016: > > Betreff: Re: [jallib] Freq Counter ACCURACY > An: [email protected] > Datum: Freitag, 8. Juli, 2016 15:01 Uhr > > 8 bit timer was more > accurate for me likely due to my implementation. I used > timer interrupts for the count (to step a variable). A 8 bit > timer interrupts more often, at a count of 0xFF instead of > 0xFFFF. > > Sent from my > iPhone > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jallib" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/jallib. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/jallib. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
