Hello Kyle,
 Done but same result
. PWM1 works and PWM2 not. Now tested on 16F
How can i combine 19 bytes in one big word

Op dinsdag 5 april 2022 om 13:30:54 UTC+2 schreef Kiste:

> Hi hans,
>
> now as I know what it is for, I can give some hints ;-)
>
> I've done remote signals a lot, and I did it this way:
>
> - I keep the PWM running all the time, at 50% duty.
> - I switch the LED on and off by setting the port pin to input/output 
> (Works if the LED is directly connected or via bipolar transistor, not via 
> FET)
>
> If you're changing the duty cycle to switch the LED on or off, there can 
> be a significant delay before the action takes effect. Switching the pin to 
> input or output works instantaneous.
>
> In the "procedure hal()" you're calling "command_send_kamer()", which is 
> probably wrong?
>
> You've got procedures for sending a bit, a byte and a full command. That 
> is good for readability, but not so good for signal quality. You send a 
> burst of 450µs, and the following pause codes the bit. If you're at the end 
> of a byte, the bit procedure is ended, then the byte procedure is ended, 
> then the loop in the command procedure is forwarding one step, the byte 
> procedure is called, then the bit procedure is called, and just then 
> there's the next burst. That's quite some time passing, which can make a 
> "0" look like a "1". Better collect all the bits in a single variable, and 
> send all 152 bits in one loop in one procedure.
>
> And even if not, this is using time in bad places:
>
> teller = 0
>      for 19 loop
>       if x == high then
>         command_send_kamer(HEAT_kamer[teller])
>        else
>         command_send_kamer(HALT_kamer[teller])
>         end if
>        teller = teller + 1
>      end loop
>
> This would be better:
>
> if x == high then
>    for 19 using teller loop
>       command_send_kamer(HEAT_kamer[teller])
>    end loop
> else
>    for 19 using teller loop
>       command_send_kamer(HALT_kamer[teller])
>    end loop
> end if
>
> That way there's no "if" between the bytes.
>
> Greets,
> Kiste 
>
>
>
> Am Dienstag, 5. April 2022, 11:47:50 MESZ hat hans <[email protected]> 
> Folgendes geschrieben: 
>
>
> Everything has its limits. We have tried to make a remote control for his 
> two DAIKIN ACs. With PWM1, the case responds just fine with PMW2 not 
> responding. The IR LEDs are controlled with an npn. (swapped) . We also 
> tried the 16F877a, same result. On an AUDICITY we compared the IR results 
> on a TSOP , the IR leds (swapped!)… Both look the same. The frequencies of 
> the PMW varied from 35 to 40. No effect.
>
> So that's the end of the story for us and then just fiddling with one PWM, 
> which we then switch via hardware. Unless ……. Any of you have a different 
> idea.
>
> Attached program and picture
>
> Op maandag 4 april 2022 om 13:52:34 UTC+2 schreef hans:
>
> Thank s Kiste
> . oops, I've now replaced all on/off's with set_dutycycle_percent(..)
>  the program that I use works fine with PWM1 but not with PWM2.
>  So there must be a difference.
>  Where should I look now?
>
> Op maandag 4 april 2022 om 12:04:31 UTC+2 schreef Kiste:
>
> Sorry, no. 
>
> PWM2_off() does not set the LED off, it switches off the PWM module and 
> passes control of the output pin back to the simple digital output. The 
> digital output can be randomly set to "on", you did not set it to "off".
>
> If you want to keep PWM running and switch off the LED, use
>
> pwm2_set_dutycycle_percent(0)
>
> pwm2_on() and pwm2_off() is not switching the *output* to on or off, it 
> starts or stops the PWM module. If you want to set LED brightness, you 
> don't want to ever stop the module. It's like waiting at the traffic 
> lights: You're setting the car speed to zero (=duty_cycle(0)), but you 
> don't switch off the engine (=pwm_off()). If the street's going downhill, a 
> switched off engine will not surely prevent the car from moving. You need 
> to use the right means for the purpose of stopping the car. 
>
> Greets,
> Kiste
>
> Am Montag, 4. April 2022, 11:43:01 MESZ hat hans <[email protected]> 
> Folgendes geschrieben: 
>
>
> Hi Kiste,
> PWM2_off() sets the led ON and PMW2_on () sets the light off.. 
> regards Hans
>
> Op maandag 4 april 2022 om 09:21:03 UTC+2 schreef Kiste:
>
> Hi hans,
>
> this is what the program should do if the LED is connected to RC1 and GND 
> (with resistor):
>
> The LED will slowly light up from off to 99% within one second,
> then it will fade from 99% to 1% within another second.
>
> The LED stays at 1% for half a second
>
> PWM is disabled, so the LED will reflect the port pin, which is undefined 
> by default, for half a second 
>
> Then, PWM is reactivated and the LED will resume at 1% for 5 seconds, 
> before starting over again.
>
> That is not what you're seeing?
>
> Greets,
> Kiste
>
>
>
> Am Sonntag, 3. April 2022, 16:10:38 MESZ hat hans <[email protected]> 
> Folgendes geschrieben: 
>
>
> A question from a friend. Attached is a test program for the use of the 
> second PWM port C1. The results are opposite to the assignment. On is off 
> and off is on. See the end of the file, the LED would go on for a long time 
> but then it is just off 
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "jallib" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/0fc3bf61-ee5b-435f-a883-fbe7e1f9188fn%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/0fc3bf61-ee5b-435f-a883-fbe7e1f9188fn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "jallib" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/977fd495-4f9e-40f7-b9eb-caa72e361cd4n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/977fd495-4f9e-40f7-b9eb-caa72e361cd4n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "jallib" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/a5691502-ada9-4089-8666-3a0399756e44n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/a5691502-ada9-4089-8666-3a0399756e44n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/c3f11c7f-47d8-4eaf-bf6d-34bd4761f886n%40googlegroups.com.

Attachment: 16f877a_daikin3.jal
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to